Full Version: Remember......
From: Peter [#1]
25 Oct 2006
To: ALL
Whether you say you can...................................................
or ...............
whether you say you cant......................................................
you
are right.....
regards
Peter
:-)
EDITED: 3 Nov 2006 by DGL
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#2]
30 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#1] 30 Oct 2006
From: rj (RANDYJOYCE) [#3]
30 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#1] 30 Oct 2006
From: Peter [#4]
30 Oct 2006
To: rj (RANDYJOYCE) [#3] 30 Oct 2006
See.........even he believes it !
Peter
From: rj (RANDYJOYCE) [#5]
30 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#4] 30 Oct 2006
From: Peter [#6]
30 Oct 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#2] 30 Oct 2006
OK..Proffessor.....
B-)
regards
Peter
From: Shaddy [#7]
30 Oct 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#2] 30 Oct 2006
I remember Jack Handy from SNL... sometimes some funny stuff.
Shaddy
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#8]
30 Oct 2006
To: Shaddy [#7] 31 Oct 2006
Ahh...the sweet smell of validation........ ;-)
Sometimes being the operative word here Shaddy......
:-)
From: Shaddy [#9]
31 Oct 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#8] 31 Oct 2006
"If trees could scream, would we be so cavilier about cutting them down?" deep thoughts, by Jack Handy
Shaddy
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#10]
31 Oct 2006
To: Shaddy [#9] 31 Oct 2006
I"m not so sure trees don't scream. I just don't think we are smart enough or advanced enough to hear them.
From: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#11]
31 Oct 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#10] 31 Oct 2006
From: Peter [#12]
31 Oct 2006
To: rj (RANDYJOYCE) [#5] 1 Nov 2006
Now you see...that is simply a transential perspective based on the thermo particular subversion of the methaphysical dimension.
regards
Peter
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#13]
31 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#12] 31 Oct 2006
Peter, Peter, Peter,
YOU of ALL people should know that if you subvert the metaphysical dimension that it is IMPOSSIBLE to transcend any perspective....let alone a transential perspective that can only be expressed on the tangent of the continuim. Depending of course on the thermo particulate of the particular continuim.
In other words, if the spectrum of the continuim is in anyway subjegated by any geometric transversal, the entire theorum will most likely collide thereby subjecting the original subjegation of the continuim to yet another perspective of the metaphyscial dimension causing a dimensionality that is purely subjective thereby diminishing ANY possibiltiy of the original transcedental permeation from being congruant with the supporting hypothesis.........
REALLY Peter. I expected more. :-(
Perhaps if I explained it in Russian?
Perhaps you need to speak with Harvey.
EDITED: 31 Oct 2006 by C_BURKE
From: Peter [#14]
31 Oct 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#13] 1 Nov 2006
YOU of ALL people should know that if you subvert the metaphysical dimension that it is IMPOSSIBLE to transcend any perspective....let alone a transential perspective that can only be expressed on the tangent of the continuim. Depending of course on the thermo particulate of the particular continuim.
In other words, if the spectrum of the continuim is in anyway subjegated by any geometric transversal, the entire theorum will most likely collide thereby subjecting the original subjegation of the continuim to yet another perspective of the metaphyscial dimension causing a dimensionality that is purely subjective thereby diminishing ANY possibiltiy of the original transcedental permeation from being congruant with the supporting hypothesis.........
Bull Sh*t
Perhaps your understanding of subjugation by a geometric transveral...goes against all tradiditional thinking and the latest scientific research of multicelular hyper extended erno-natons?
I would not only challenge you...But be happy to debunk your understanding, that is not only based on darwinian thinking, but is an insult to any free thinking theorist and intellectual that partakes the information on these boards....
May I point out, that Sir Leyton Barr-Hopworths 1928 thesis on Geometric Transversal was the leading paper on disproving that there was not only a possibility, but...all previous notions that all transcendental permeations were totally congruant with the supporting hypothesis.
Sheesh ! (devil)
regards
Peter
From: UncleSteve [#15]
31 Oct 2006
To: ALL
Choice of 3 sizes!
Deep, Chuck or Peter
Get 'em while you still have yer head above the "fray"!
SPECIAL FOR THIS THREAD ONLY! FREE SHOVEL WITH THE PURCHASE OF 3 PAIR OF BOOTS!!!
EDITED: 31 Oct 2006 by UNCLESTEVE
From: Peter [#16]
31 Oct 2006
To: UncleSteve [#15] 1 Nov 2006
I see Steve is trying to throw a little humour into a very....serious debate...
Now Steve ...its alright to be funny....but.....
regards
Peter
From: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#17]
31 Oct 2006
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#11] 31 Oct 2006
David,
If I hit a tree today with a golf ball, it wouldn't scream, it would shatter, it's 5 above right now.
From the cold and snowy Rockies!
Dave
From: Dave Jones (DAVERJ) [#18]
31 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#14] 1 Nov 2006
I would not only challenge you...But be happy to debunk your understanding, that is not only based on darwinian thinking, but is an insult to any free thinking theorist and intellectual that partakes the information on these boards....
May I point out, that Sir Leyton Barr-Hopworths 1928 thesis on Geometric Transversal was the leading paper on disproving that there was not only a possibility, but...all previous notions that all transcendental permeations were totally congruant with the supporting hypothesis.
"My brain hurts."
--Monty Python
From: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#19]
31 Oct 2006
To: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#17] 1 Nov 2006
From: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#20]
1 Nov 2006
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#19] 1 Nov 2006
Show messages: 1-20 21-40 41-51