Full Version: Remember......

From: Peter [#12]
 31 Oct 2006
To: rj (RANDYJOYCE) [#5] 1 Nov 2006

Now you see...that is simply a transential perspective based on the thermo particular subversion of the methaphysical dimension.

regards
Peter

---

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#13]
 31 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#12] 31 Oct 2006

Peter, Peter, Peter,

YOU of ALL people should know that if you subvert the metaphysical dimension that it is IMPOSSIBLE to transcend any perspective....let alone a transential perspective that can only be expressed on the tangent of the continuim. Depending of course on the thermo particulate of the particular continuim.
In other words, if the spectrum of the continuim is in anyway subjegated by any geometric transversal, the entire theorum will most likely collide thereby subjecting the original subjegation of the continuim to yet another perspective of the metaphyscial dimension causing a dimensionality that is purely subjective thereby diminishing ANY possibiltiy of the original transcedental permeation from being congruant with the supporting hypothesis.........

REALLY Peter. I expected more. :-( 

Perhaps if I explained it in Russian?

Perhaps you need to speak with Harvey.

EDITED: 31 Oct 2006 by C_BURKE

---

From: Peter [#14]
 31 Oct 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#13] 1 Nov 2006

Bull Sh*t

Perhaps your understanding of subjugation by a geometric transveral...goes against all tradiditional thinking and the latest scientific research of multicelular hyper extended erno-natons?

I would not only challenge you...But be happy to debunk your understanding, that is not only based on darwinian thinking, but is an insult to any free thinking theorist and intellectual that partakes the information on these boards....


May I point out, that Sir Leyton Barr-Hopworths 1928 thesis on Geometric Transversal was the leading paper on disproving that there was not only a possibility, but...all previous notions that all transcendental permeations were totally congruant with the supporting hypothesis.

Sheesh ! (devil) 

regards
Peter

---

From: UncleSteve [#15]
 31 Oct 2006
To: ALL

Step right up!!! Get ya' boots! Hip boots, that is!

Choice of 3 sizes!
Deep, Chuck or Peter

Get 'em while you still have yer head above the "fray"!

SPECIAL FOR THIS THREAD ONLY! FREE SHOVEL WITH THE PURCHASE OF 3 PAIR OF BOOTS!!!

EDITED: 31 Oct 2006 by UNCLESTEVE

---

From: Peter [#16]
 31 Oct 2006
To: UncleSteve [#15] 1 Nov 2006

I see Steve is trying to throw a little humour into a very....serious debate...

Now Steve ...its alright to be funny....but.....

regards
Peter

---

From: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#17]
 31 Oct 2006
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#11] 31 Oct 2006

David,

If I hit a tree today with a golf ball, it wouldn't scream, it would shatter, it's 5 above right now.

From the cold and snowy Rockies!
Dave

---

From: Dave Jones (DAVERJ) [#18]
 31 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#14] 1 Nov 2006

"My brain hurts."
--Monty Python

---

From: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#19]
 31 Oct 2006
To: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#17] 1 Nov 2006

Hey, shouldn't you be outside shoveling snow? (devil) 

---

From: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#20]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#19] 1 Nov 2006

Nah, with only 5" on the ground, it's nice to walk barefooted thru it. Kills the Athletes feet fungus ;-) 

---

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#21]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#14] 1 Nov 2006

I Stand corrected.

---

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#22]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#21] 1 Nov 2006

And I sit here confounded.

---

From: UncleSteve [#23]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#16] 1 Nov 2006

Bambi says its not nice to fool with Mother Nature! (devil) 

---

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24]
 1 Nov 2006
To: UncleSteve [#23] 1 Nov 2006

And just WHAT does "Bambi" know about thermo particulate continuim dynamic hypothises's? HUH? Peter can barely comprehend.....let alone "Bambi"

EDITED: 1 Nov 2006 by C_BURKE

---

From: UncleSteve [#25]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24] 1 Nov 2006

Chuck, NEVER assume!!!! :S 

---

From: Peter [#26]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24] 2 Nov 2006

hmmmm..

who stood corrected ???????

;-) 

---

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#27]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#26] 2 Nov 2006

I did............. Based of course on the hypothetical theorum of the densified particulate matter of the hyperbolic continuim.....

---

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#27] 2 Nov 2006

But what power and speed setting to engrave that particulate you keep talking about? I have a client on the phone asking about it as we speak...

Gary

---

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#29]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28] 2 Nov 2006

You must collate your particle beam to keep the interference patterns from becoming hyperbolic.

---

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#30]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28] 2 Nov 2006

Gary, the particulate is particularly difficult to parse with a laser especially on the hyperbolic. MY machine won't do the job, so I was thinking of getting the 400 w Universal I saw last year.........

---

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#31]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#29] 2 Nov 2006

Well, it will just have to wait until tomorrow. I am spending the day with tech support aligning my beam with the red dot - now I have to collate it too?

---

Show messages:  1-11  12-31  32-51

Back to thread list | Login

© 2025 Project Beehive Forum