Full Version: Remember......

From: Peter [#16]
 31 Oct 2006
To: UncleSteve [#15] 1 Nov 2006

I see Steve is trying to throw a little humour into a very....serious debate...

Now Steve ...its alright to be funny....but.....

regards
Peter

From: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#17]
 31 Oct 2006
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#11] 31 Oct 2006

David,

If I hit a tree today with a golf ball, it wouldn't scream, it would shatter, it's 5 above right now.

From the cold and snowy Rockies!
Dave

From: Dave Jones (DAVERJ) [#18]
 31 Oct 2006
To: Peter [#14] 1 Nov 2006

quote:
Perhaps your understanding of subjugation by a geometric transveral...goes against all tradiditional thinking and the latest scientific research of multicelular hyper extended erno-natons?

I would not only challenge you...But be happy to debunk your understanding, that is not only based on darwinian thinking, but is an insult to any free thinking theorist and intellectual that partakes the information on these boards....


May I point out, that Sir Leyton Barr-Hopworths 1928 thesis on Geometric Transversal was the leading paper on disproving that there was not only a possibility, but...all previous notions that all transcendental permeations were totally congruant with the supporting hypothesis.


"My brain hurts."
--Monty Python

From: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#19]
 31 Oct 2006
To: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#17] 1 Nov 2006

Hey, shouldn't you be outside shoveling snow? (devil) 

From: Dave (MT_DAVE) [#20]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#19] 1 Nov 2006

Nah, with only 5" on the ground, it's nice to walk barefooted thru it. Kills the Athletes feet fungus ;-) 

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#21]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#14] 1 Nov 2006

quote:

May I point out, that Sir Leyton Barr-Hopworths 1928 thesis on Geometric Transversal was the leading paper on disproving that there was not only a possibility, but...all previous notions that all transcendental permeations were totally congruant with the supporting hypothesis.



I Stand corrected.

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#22]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#21] 1 Nov 2006

And I sit here confounded.

From: UncleSteve [#23]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#16] 1 Nov 2006

quote:
Steve is trying to throw a little humour into a very....serious debate


Bambi says its not nice to fool with Mother Nature! (devil) 

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24]
 1 Nov 2006
To: UncleSteve [#23] 1 Nov 2006

quote:
Bambi says its not nice to fool with Mother Nature! (devil) 



And just WHAT does "Bambi" know about thermo particulate continuim dynamic hypothises's? HUH? Peter can barely comprehend.....let alone "Bambi"

EDITED: 1 Nov 2006 by C_BURKE

From: UncleSteve [#25]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24] 1 Nov 2006

quote:
Peter can barely comprehend.....let alone "Bambi"


Chuck, NEVER assume!!!! :S 

From: Peter [#26]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24] 2 Nov 2006

hmmmm..

who stood corrected ???????

;-) 

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#27]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#26] 2 Nov 2006

I did............. Based of course on the hypothetical theorum of the densified particulate matter of the hyperbolic continuim.....

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#27] 2 Nov 2006

But what power and speed setting to engrave that particulate you keep talking about? I have a client on the phone asking about it as we speak...

Gary

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#29]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28] 2 Nov 2006

You must collate your particle beam to keep the interference patterns from becoming hyperbolic.

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#30]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28] 2 Nov 2006

Gary, the particulate is particularly difficult to parse with a laser especially on the hyperbolic. MY machine won't do the job, so I was thinking of getting the 400 w Universal I saw last year.........

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#31]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#29] 2 Nov 2006

Well, it will just have to wait until tomorrow. I am spending the day with tech support aligning my beam with the red dot - now I have to collate it too?

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#32]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#30] 2 Nov 2006

400Watt - I thought 30 would be plenty for most of the things I need to do. Next you'll tell me that my servo motors won't work and I need stepper :'-( 

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#33]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#31] 2 Nov 2006

Yes.

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#34]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#32] 2 Nov 2006

Gary,
No, you servo motors should be fine as long as you don't try the convex hyperbolic......the concave works fine.........

From: GBengraver [#35]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#34] 2 Nov 2006

you servo motors should be fine

How do you know he is a servo motor?
Is it his accent?

Greg

Show messages:  1-15  16-35  36-51

Back to thread list | Login

© 2025 Project Beehive Forum