Full Version: Remember......

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#21]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#14] 1 Nov 2006

quote:

May I point out, that Sir Leyton Barr-Hopworths 1928 thesis on Geometric Transversal was the leading paper on disproving that there was not only a possibility, but...all previous notions that all transcendental permeations were totally congruant with the supporting hypothesis.



I Stand corrected.

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#22]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#21] 1 Nov 2006

And I sit here confounded.

From: UncleSteve [#23]
 1 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#16] 1 Nov 2006

quote:
Steve is trying to throw a little humour into a very....serious debate


Bambi says its not nice to fool with Mother Nature! (devil) 

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24]
 1 Nov 2006
To: UncleSteve [#23] 1 Nov 2006

quote:
Bambi says its not nice to fool with Mother Nature! (devil) 



And just WHAT does "Bambi" know about thermo particulate continuim dynamic hypothises's? HUH? Peter can barely comprehend.....let alone "Bambi"

EDITED: 1 Nov 2006 by C_BURKE

From: UncleSteve [#25]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24] 1 Nov 2006

quote:
Peter can barely comprehend.....let alone "Bambi"


Chuck, NEVER assume!!!! :S 

From: Peter [#26]
 1 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#24] 2 Nov 2006

hmmmm..

who stood corrected ???????

;-) 

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#27]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#26] 2 Nov 2006

I did............. Based of course on the hypothetical theorum of the densified particulate matter of the hyperbolic continuim.....

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#27] 2 Nov 2006

But what power and speed setting to engrave that particulate you keep talking about? I have a client on the phone asking about it as we speak...

Gary

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#29]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28] 2 Nov 2006

You must collate your particle beam to keep the interference patterns from becoming hyperbolic.

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#30]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#28] 2 Nov 2006

Gary, the particulate is particularly difficult to parse with a laser especially on the hyperbolic. MY machine won't do the job, so I was thinking of getting the 400 w Universal I saw last year.........

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#31]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#29] 2 Nov 2006

Well, it will just have to wait until tomorrow. I am spending the day with tech support aligning my beam with the red dot - now I have to collate it too?

From: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#32]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#30] 2 Nov 2006

400Watt - I thought 30 would be plenty for most of the things I need to do. Next you'll tell me that my servo motors won't work and I need stepper :'-( 

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#33]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#31] 2 Nov 2006

Yes.

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#34]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE) [#32] 2 Nov 2006

Gary,
No, you servo motors should be fine as long as you don't try the convex hyperbolic......the concave works fine.........

From: GBengraver [#35]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#34] 2 Nov 2006

you servo motors should be fine

How do you know he is a servo motor?
Is it his accent?

Greg

From: Peter [#36]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#34] 2 Nov 2006

we've had a massive misfunction with our themagulated hyper extender. As a result all our disticular arlanthiams have been burnt.

We now have to replace the particulant nano expander and re calibrate the thermolaterizer...otherwize it will just burn holes straight thru the metal...as we all know..

does everyone concur ?

From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#37]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#36] 3 Nov 2006

quote:
We now have to replace the particulant nano expander and re calibrate the thermolaterizer...otherwize it will just burn holes straight thru the metal...as we all know..



Peter, Whatever would you do without me.......I know that you know that I know that you know that you know that you must be EXTREMELY careful whe replacing the particulant nano expander, because if you do NOT take special note to know the correct pressure applied to the particulant, during recalibration, it is likely that it could become very parallent there by resulting in massive burns to the testiculant partition of the thermolaterizer its self, reducing the potency of the entire process. I KNOW that you know that I know that you know that. You DO know that don't you?

From: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#38]
 2 Nov 2006
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#37] 3 Nov 2006

Wear your safety goggles. :S 

From: Dave Jones (DAVERJ) [#39]
 2 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#36] 3 Nov 2006

Sounds like you just need to replace the flux capacitor

From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#40]
 3 Nov 2006
To: Peter [#36] 3 Nov 2006

Told you that you should have collumated the particle beam. Now you are in a pile of burned brown stuff.

Show messages:  1-20  21-40  41-51

Back to thread list | Login

© 2025 Project Beehive Forum