From: Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) [#79]
9 Sep 2006
To: Mick [#78] 9 Sep 2006
The link itself was not the reason for removal. David's explanation was that the post was redundant to redundant.
Gees, so is this one.
EDITED: 9 Sep 2006 by HARVEY-ONLY
Show messages:
1-18
19-38
39-58
59-78
79